A few caveats. I've used 22,500 as the capacity for DC United, Houston, and the Revs, as they play in American football stadiums. Yes, I know the new Houston stadium will have more seats, but until I see the actual number, I'm sticking with 22,500. San Jose is obviously at a disadvantage by playing in Buck Shaw Stadium, with a capacity of just over 10,000. And of course, the caveats in the WSJ article about capacities should be factored in when examining these numbers.
The MLS figures in BOLD indicate where they are outdrawing their counterpart.
NBA and MLS | ||||||
Rank | NBA | AVG | % of CAP | MLS | AVG | % of CAP |
7 | Lakers | 18,997 | 99.7 | Galaxy | 21,183 | 78.5 |
14 | Raptors | 17,897 | 90.4 | TFC | 20,453 | 93.1 |
26 | 76ers | 14,224 | 70.0 | Union | 19,252 | 91.2 |
30 | Nets | 13,103 | 69.1 | RBNY | 18,625 | 73.9 |
6 | Jazz | 19,378 | 97.3 | RSL | 17,095 | 88.4 |
19 | Rockets | 16,528 | 91.6 | Dynamo | 16,833 | 74.8 |
1 | Bulls | 20,725 | 99.1 | Fire | 15,814 | 79.1 |
20 | Clippers | 16,343 | 85.7 | Chivas USA | 14,557 | 53.9 |
21 | Wizards | 16,204 | 80.3 | DCU | 14,279 | 63.5 |
13 | Nuggets | 17,995 | 93.9 | Rapids | 13,014 | 72.0 |
9 | Celtics | 18,169 | 97.6 | Revs | 12,987 | 57.7 |
4 | Mavericks | 19,994 | 104.1 | FCD | 10,815 | 51.0 |
NHL and MLS | ||||||
Rank | NHL | AVG | % of CAP | MLS | AVG | % of CAP |
16 | Kings | 17,313 | 93.6 | Galaxy | 21,183 | 78.5 |
6 | Maple Leafs | 19,260 | 102.5 | TFC | 20,453 | 93.1 |
4 | Flyers | 19,535 | 100.2 | Union | 19,252 | 91.2 |
20 | Devils | 15,535 | 88.1 | RBNY | 18,625 | 73.9 |
1 | Blackhawks | 21,356 | 108.3 | Fire | 15,814 | 79.1 |
22 | Blue Jackets | 15,416 | 85.0 | Crew | 14,330 | 71.7 |
11 | Capitals | 18,277 | 100.0 | DCU | 14,279 | 63.5 |
27 | Avalanche | 13,947 | 77.5 | Rapids | 13,014 | 72.0 |
15 | Bruins | 17,388 | 99.0 | Revs | 12,987 | 57.7 |
17 | Stars | 17,215 | 92.9 | FCD | 10,815 | 51.0 |
14 | Sharks | 17,558 | 100.4 | Quakes | 9,593 | 93.8 |
Too bad Seattle doesn't have NBA/NHL teams to compare with the Sounders FC :)
ReplyDelete